<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office Grudge Match: Tug of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war</link>
	<description>We Make Jeeps ROCK!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Mills</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-18858</link>
		<dc:creator>R Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-18858</guid>
		<description>So putting a short wheel base against a long wheel base, interesting, why dont you put a JK in instead or you think its not good enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So putting a short wheel base against a long wheel base, interesting, why dont you put a JK in instead or you think its not good enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gator</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-18360</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-18360</guid>
		<description>With the power to weight ratio all indications point to the Grand Cherokee. However the YJ might be able to pull it off if the driver knows what he is doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the power to weight ratio all indications point to the Grand Cherokee. However the YJ might be able to pull it off if the driver knows what he is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel F</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-15633</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-15633</guid>
		<description>I think the WJ, I own a &#039;02 4.7L, nothing special, but it make a excellent Expedition vehicle. The 4.7 has plenty of torque. I had to pull out a stuck TJ  with 6&quot; lift, 35&quot; med tires. The wagon has much better weight distribution as well. WAGONS ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the WJ, I own a &#8217;02 4.7L, nothing special, but it make a excellent Expedition vehicle. The 4.7 has plenty of torque. I had to pull out a stuck TJ  with 6&#8243; lift, 35&#8243; med tires. The wagon has much better weight distribution as well. WAGONS ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Van Auken</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-13293</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Van Auken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-13293</guid>
		<description>The YJ will win because it must! It&#039;s a Wrangler and worth ten of any Cherokee on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The YJ will win because it must! It&#8217;s a Wrangler and worth ten of any Cherokee on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-13175</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-13175</guid>
		<description>I say the WJ.  (It isn&#039;t a ZJ folks, heh)

Skinnier tires with more weight = increased traction.  The bigger and wider tires of the lighter weight YJ won&#039;t have the same traction on dry ground IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say the WJ.  (It isn&#8217;t a ZJ folks, heh)</p>
<p>Skinnier tires with more weight = increased traction.  The bigger and wider tires of the lighter weight YJ won&#8217;t have the same traction on dry ground IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-10996</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-10996</guid>
		<description>Though the YJ with the 2.5 has 4:10 gearing, I think the 35s will affect it&#039;s pulling power and as Nick said, the weight of the WJ will be too much for it...on asphalt! Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the YJ with the 2.5 has 4:10 gearing, I think the 35s will affect it&#8217;s pulling power and as Nick said, the weight of the WJ will be too much for it&#8230;on asphalt! Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Office Grudge Match: Tug of War : Rugged Ridge Jeep Accessories -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-6417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Office Grudge Match: Tug of War : Rugged Ridge Jeep Accessories -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-6417</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Oconee Off-road, Rugged Ridge. Rugged Ridge said: Blog Post: Office Grudge Match: Tug of War http://bit.ly/fVOFPO #fb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Oconee Off-road, Rugged Ridge. Rugged Ridge said: Blog Post: Office Grudge Match: Tug of War <a href="http://bit.ly/fVOFPO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fVOFPO</a> #fb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>We could get really technical about this and ask for specifics like what surface, what sort of tires, manual or automatic, etc, but I&#039;m thinking the Y, simply because of the traction and low-range torque available.  I think that will overcome the ZJ&#039;s weight advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could get really technical about this and ask for specifics like what surface, what sort of tires, manual or automatic, etc, but I&#8217;m thinking the Y, simply because of the traction and low-range torque available.  I think that will overcome the ZJ&#8217;s weight advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/office-grudge-match-tug-of-war/comment-page-1#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruggedridgeoffroad.com/blog/?p=765#comment-6415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d imagine the Cherokee would win based solely on weight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d imagine the Cherokee would win based solely on weight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

